"cesariojpn" (cesariojpn)
10/15/2016 at 02:45 • Filed to: None
2
8|
"cesariojpn" (cesariojpn)
10/15/2016 at 02:45 • Filed to: None | 2
| 8 |
Also, TIL 93 Octane isn’t sold in Colorado. 91 Octane is the highest octane level sold there.
Blunion05 drives a pink S2000 (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
> cesariojpn
10/15/2016 at 03:02 |
|
lol the fukn wheels are curbed
Birddog
> cesariojpn
10/15/2016 at 03:06 |
|
That was actually pretty fun to watch.
I can almost see something from every generation in this current machine.
Wheelerguy
> cesariojpn
10/15/2016 at 03:21 |
|
So it’s between that and a Superlight Hurricane.
Flavien Vidal
> cesariojpn
10/15/2016 at 04:46 |
|
It’s normal that it’s not sold in Colorado... High altitude and high octane don’t mix well. Performance cars need lower octane at high altitude.
|
cesariojpn
> Flavien Vidal
10/15/2016 at 05:13 |
|
Then why does GMC need a truck full of 93 in a tank bed if this is the case?
|
Flavien Vidal
> cesariojpn
10/15/2016 at 06:54 |
|
Because they know buyers will want to stick to the highest octane possible even at high altitude and even if it’s stupid to do. Higher octane means that it burns slower than lower octane. Combine that with high altitude and less oxygen making it burn even slower and you usually need to reduce octane when driving in high places.
But people keep on thinking that higher octane equals better gas, which is simply not the case and why you shouldn’t use high octane in a car that doesn’t need it.
sdwarf36
> cesariojpn
10/15/2016 at 08:55 |
|
Wow-the motor fits in the back? /sarc
Smallbear wants a modern Syclone, local Maple Leafs spammer
> cesariojpn
10/15/2016 at 14:06 |
|
NO MID ENGINE